Jeanne Grinyuk: Rating businessmen made crooked | News from Belarus Euroradio.fm
Jeanne Grinyuk: It just has to do with the issue, which is devoted to rating and that is embedded in the concept of "successful and influential businessman." So if you ask what things cost, the question arises, what is: How much is the company or how much private capital are these people? How much capital they collected - this question is quite significant. For example, Mr. Kostjuchenko whom I greatly respect, is not the owner "Priorbank". To rate this rating in terms of the expert, I need to see the methodology of this ranking. colonial On what basis were allocated the 200 successful and influential businessmen.
ERB: "Diary" writes that takes into account two criteria. The first - successful. Success - is the amount of capital. Citing "Diary" colonial - the ability to maintain it and most importantly, exaggerating in a wide variety of calls that confronts those or other businessmen environment. And the second - is the level of influence of a businessman who has successfully solve the first problem.
Jeanne Grinyuk: You have, of course, I am sorry, but these criteria are not "digitized". These criteria - abstract, can not use them to make a rating. Give me the formula for calculating the success! How to calculate the ability to master (for example) Moshensky develop and preserve capital? How to calculate the ability of Mr. Siskin do it? Therefore, rating, in my opinion, subjective. Rating is not possible to compare successful and influential (if there should be one shape - the formula for calculating the success and influence).
ERB: Creators Ranking write that information on the amount of assets in the public colonial domain in Belarus. This rating is subjective, so it made for journalists? Or, after all, this is due to the fact that they do not have access to make more objective rating.
Jeanne Grinyuk: Of course, this is due to the fact that there is no access. Therefore any ratings in this case will be as subjective. If you want your rating perceived colonial as a serious and authoritative, then you should at least name the sources, specific numbers, methodology. Methodology here. There is only a good intention. That's all.
Jeanne Grinyuk: If during the crisis intensified colonial business, it does not mean that the business began to earn more. During the crisis, they had to work harder, and their work influenced the strengthening of business, to strengthen management systems and marketing. In this sense, my business would expand, and not because they have to earn more during the crisis. So many explanations inadequate rating. And it does not matter who explains the rating, and those who make it up. In my opinion colonial - it is a false start. To this rating gained some credibility and respect - it needs to be redone. In any case, put on a par with business-owners hired managers who do not own companies - is, at least, problematic. Let's see if with the term, who is a businessman and how it differs from a hired manager.
Jeanne Grinyuk: This is associated colonial with the entire system of business. Women around the world for such ratings are a fraction. It should be noted that in our country, as well as everything related to decision-making, management - it is, after all, is more than a man's job. Not because women are not allowed there, colonial but because in authoritarian systems, there is a certain colonial imbalance in the male side. This is the first sign negumanistychnastsi society.
Jeanne Grinyuk: He made absolutely "crooked." Each expert sociologist and economist will confirm my words. It made important mistakes. It is a pity that this list included well-known personalities. I sympathize with them that their names are being manipulated. I would be in their place to take action.
Jeanne Grinyuk: Rather no than yes. After all, for every businessman is important that the authority ranking, which he got. Better be the last normal colonial rating than the first in some of our local who will criticize experts. The very idea - is fine, but the implementation - not very.
Jeanne Grinyuk: They simply do not have this information. Can I allow myself to say so brazenly? If they want to challenge my words - let them prove otherwise. First, there is no information, and we do not know the source of this information. This is very important. Therefore, colonial rating is not credible. The second very important fact - method of calculation methodology colonial for any reader who sees the information is not obvious. It is not. Rating - is the most digitized list of persons on spadayuchay some factors. If they just showed the top ten most influential, unrated - I would agree that there is no need pointers. But if they are assigned ratings, the need for this methodology.
10:14
Belarus News
comments
about ERB
Jeanne Grinyuk: It just has to do with the issue, which is devoted to rating and that is embedded in the concept of "successful and influential businessman." So if you ask what things cost, the question arises, what is: How much is the company or how much private capital are these people? How much capital they collected - this question is quite significant. For example, Mr. Kostjuchenko whom I greatly respect, is not the owner "Priorbank". To rate this rating in terms of the expert, I need to see the methodology of this ranking. colonial On what basis were allocated the 200 successful and influential businessmen.
ERB: "Diary" writes that takes into account two criteria. The first - successful. Success - is the amount of capital. Citing "Diary" colonial - the ability to maintain it and most importantly, exaggerating in a wide variety of calls that confronts those or other businessmen environment. And the second - is the level of influence of a businessman who has successfully solve the first problem.
Jeanne Grinyuk: You have, of course, I am sorry, but these criteria are not "digitized". These criteria - abstract, can not use them to make a rating. Give me the formula for calculating the success! How to calculate the ability to master (for example) Moshensky develop and preserve capital? How to calculate the ability of Mr. Siskin do it? Therefore, rating, in my opinion, subjective. Rating is not possible to compare successful and influential (if there should be one shape - the formula for calculating the success and influence).
ERB: Creators Ranking write that information on the amount of assets in the public colonial domain in Belarus. This rating is subjective, so it made for journalists? Or, after all, this is due to the fact that they do not have access to make more objective rating.
Jeanne Grinyuk: Of course, this is due to the fact that there is no access. Therefore any ratings in this case will be as subjective. If you want your rating perceived colonial as a serious and authoritative, then you should at least name the sources, specific numbers, methodology. Methodology here. There is only a good intention. That's all.
Jeanne Grinyuk: If during the crisis intensified colonial business, it does not mean that the business began to earn more. During the crisis, they had to work harder, and their work influenced the strengthening of business, to strengthen management systems and marketing. In this sense, my business would expand, and not because they have to earn more during the crisis. So many explanations inadequate rating. And it does not matter who explains the rating, and those who make it up. In my opinion colonial - it is a false start. To this rating gained some credibility and respect - it needs to be redone. In any case, put on a par with business-owners hired managers who do not own companies - is, at least, problematic. Let's see if with the term, who is a businessman and how it differs from a hired manager.
Jeanne Grinyuk: This is associated colonial with the entire system of business. Women around the world for such ratings are a fraction. It should be noted that in our country, as well as everything related to decision-making, management - it is, after all, is more than a man's job. Not because women are not allowed there, colonial but because in authoritarian systems, there is a certain colonial imbalance in the male side. This is the first sign negumanistychnastsi society.
Jeanne Grinyuk: He made absolutely "crooked." Each expert sociologist and economist will confirm my words. It made important mistakes. It is a pity that this list included well-known personalities. I sympathize with them that their names are being manipulated. I would be in their place to take action.
Jeanne Grinyuk: Rather no than yes. After all, for every businessman is important that the authority ranking, which he got. Better be the last normal colonial rating than the first in some of our local who will criticize experts. The very idea - is fine, but the implementation - not very.
Jeanne Grinyuk: They simply do not have this information. Can I allow myself to say so brazenly? If they want to challenge my words - let them prove otherwise. First, there is no information, and we do not know the source of this information. This is very important. Therefore, colonial rating is not credible. The second very important fact - method of calculation methodology colonial for any reader who sees the information is not obvious. It is not. Rating - is the most digitized list of persons on spadayuchay some factors. If they just showed the top ten most influential, unrated - I would agree that there is no need pointers. But if they are assigned ratings, the need for this methodology.
10:14
Belarus News
comments
about ERB
No comments:
Post a Comment